Legal Opinion

Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 14, 2018No. H044764PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBamattre-Manoukian, J.

*133Labor Code section 226.2,1 which became effective January 1, 2016, addresses the manner in which piece-rate employees are to be compensated for rest and recovery periods and other *134nonproductive time on the job (collectively, rest/NP time). Subdivision (b) of the statute (hereafter section 226.2(b) ) provides a safe harbor for an employer that, prior to 2016, failed to properly compensate its piece-rate workers for rest/NP time.2 Under section 226.2(b), an employer that pays its employees for previously unpaid rest/NP time accrued between July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015, is entitled to…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Nisei Farmers League v. Cal. Labor & Workforce Dev. Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Moss v. Duncan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Athletics Investment Group LLC v. Dept. of Toxic Substances ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Athletics Investment Group v. Dept. of Toxic Substances ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API