Legal Opinion

Martha Garcia v. Pacificare of California, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2014No. 13-55468PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a single issue: does an insurance company’s categorical exclusion of myoelectric prosthetics from a health insurance plan violate California Health & Safety Code § 1367.18? We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and hold that such an exclusion does not violate this statute.

I. BACKGROUND

In 1989, eleven-year-old Martha Garcia (“Garcia”) contracted spinal meningitis, which necessitated the amputation of her hands at the wrists and her legs below the knees. From 1990 to 1996 she used body-powered/cable and harness upper-extremity prostheses.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Heald CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Yeager v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. Garcia v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Laurel Chastain v. Poynter Law GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Lonnie Keenan v. Cox CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API