Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, S. J.
These consolidated appeals are from circuit court judgments on review of a series of Public Utility Commission (PUC) orders that allowed Portland General Electric (PGE) to include a “rate of return” (i.e., profit) component, as well as the principal amount of its “undepreciated investment” in the retired Trojan generating facility, in its rates for the years 1995 to 2011. Two different circuit court judges, respectively, affirmed PUC’s “declaratory orders,” and reversed and remanded its ratemaking order. On appeal, we review PUC’s orders directly, rather than reviewing the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. SabinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Dreyer v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Utility Reform Project v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Wah Chang v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.