Legal Opinion

Dreyer v. Portland General Electric Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2006No. CC 03 C10639; SC S52217; CC 03 C10640; SC S52284PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In these consolidated actions against defendant Portland General Electric Company (PGE) brought by current and former customers of that utility, PGE asks this court to issue writs of mandamus ordering the Marion County Circuit Court to dismiss plaintiffs’ actions and to vacate an order certifying plaintiffs as a class. PGE contends, among other things, that the circuit court lacks jurisdiction to hear the actions because the cases necessarily involve rate-setting, a function that the legislature has delegated exclusively to the Oregon Public Utility Commission (the PUC). Although we reject…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Service Lumber Co. v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Service Lumber Co. v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McPherson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  2. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Utility Reform Project v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API