Legal Opinion
Gearhart v. Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 6, 2013No. 08487, 09093; A140317PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
As a result of one Supreme Court opinion, Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or 262, 278-79, 142 P3d 1010 (2006), and two Court of Appeals opinions, Citizens’ Utility Board v. PUC, 154 Or App 702, 962 P2d 744 (1998), rev dismissed, 335 Or 91 (2002) (Trojan I), and Utility Reform Project v. PUC, 215 Or App 360, 170 P3d 1074 (2007) (Trojan II), the Oregon Public Utilities Commission (the PUC) was directed to reconsider the rates that the PUC had approved and that intervenor Portland General Electric (PGE) had charged customers for the sale of electricity and related services for two separate periods, from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. SabinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Calpine Energy Solutions LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Utility Reform Project v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Wah Chang v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.