Legal Opinion
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Wallace
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1937PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The issues presented by this appeal concern the validity of that part of an order made by the Public Utilities Commissioner of this state, which lowers plaintiff’s charges for local or exchange telephone service. The order is challenged by the plaintiff in attacks upon the commissioner’s findings which fix the value of the plaintiff’s plant, and which determine the amount of its net income after the commissioner had readjusted its revenue and expenses.
On March 25, 1931, the Honorable Charles M. Thomas, who was then Public Utilities Commissioner of this state, instituted on his own motion a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.