Legal Opinion

Wah Chang v. Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 2013No. UM1002; A143692PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Petitioner Wah Chang entered into a special contract with PacifiCorp whereby PacifiCorp agreed to supply Wah Chang with electricity at rates different from its standard industrial tariff. For the first three years of the five-year contract, Wah Chang was to receive a rate that was substantially lower than PacifiCorp’s standard industrial rate; for the remaining two years, Wah Chang was to be charged a rate tied to the Dow Jones California/Oregon Border (DOW COB) index, a market index that purported to reflect the average price for “day ahead” wholesale power transactions at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. SabinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Bobo v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calpine Energy Solutions LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Utility Reform Project v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API