Township of Fruitport v. Baxter
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Plaintiff filed this action to restrain defendants from using their property in violation of plaintiff’s zoning ordinance. Trial of the action resulted in judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal and claim the record establishes a nonconforming use prior to the effective date of the ordinance, and if this is not the fact, the trial court erred in the scope of the injunction granted.
Plaintiff’s zoning ordinance became effective August 22, 1959, and defendants’ property lies in the area zoned residential. Although the ordinance prohibits the use of property zoned residential for junkyard…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mayor C.C. of Balto. v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Ashline v. Bristol Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Wait v. City of SturgisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rose v. FullerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Dingeman Advertising, Inc. v. Algoma TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Peacock Township v. PanettaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ogorek v. LoisellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Beasley v. PotterDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.