Legal Opinion

Peacock Township v. Panetta

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1978No. Docket 77-2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right from an injunction entered by the Lake County Circuit Court prohibiting defendants from using their property as a primitive campground.

The record reveals the following facts. Plaintiff, Peacock Township, adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance that went into effect on September 22, 1970. The ordinance established four types of zoning districts: Residential A, Residential B, Commercial-Residential, and Agricultural.

Defendants own a 10-acre parcel of land, of which part is zoned commercial-residential and the remainder is zoned agricultural. Defendants operated a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dusdal v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Township of Fruitport v. BaxterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Talcott v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Bell River Associates v. China Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. MacEnas v. Village of MichianaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API