Legal Opinion

Ogorek v. Loisell

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1971No. Docket 8903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from a boundary dispute. The plaintiffs and defendants share a north-south boundary, the plaintiffs’ property being the more southern property. They sued defendants seeking to enjoin defendants permanently from trespassing on their property. The trial court was asked to decide three questions: (1) Did the old fence line constitute the true boundary between the property of the parties or was that boundary north of the fence line? (2) If the fence line was not the boundary as described by the deeds, had the fence line become the boundary by acquiescence? (3) If the fence line…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rose v. FullerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Monroe v. RawlingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Barley v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Whitehall Leather Co. v. CapekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caywood v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fisher v. MullerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Davids v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. MacKinac Island Development Co. v. Burton Abstract & Title Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Caywood v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API