Legal Opinion

Fass v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1948No. Docket No. 9, Calendar No. 43,852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill of complaint for the purpose of having the officers and officials of the city of Highland Park enjoined and restrained from enforcing a certain zoning ordinance of the city of Highland Park.

Tbe agreed facts are as follows: On October 1, 1942, plaintiffs, Max Fass and Mina Fass, bis wife, were engaged in tbe business of operating a retail poultry market at 14454 Oakland avenue in tbe city of Highland Park. In tbe operation of tbis market' plaintiffs killed, defeathered and dressed tbe poultry on tbe premises and completed tbe sale to tbe customer within a short period…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Township of Pittsfield v. MalcolmMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Township of Fruitport v. BaxterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Winchester v. W a Foote Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API