Rose v. Fuller
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff instituted this action in circuit court, alleging that title to Lot # 56 of St. Hubert’s Subdivision belonged to her through adverse possession. Plaintiff is the undisputed owner of a rectangular 80 acres of land immediately adjacent to the disputed Lot # 56. The complaint sets forth that plaintiff and her predecessors in title have been in exclusive possession of these premises (Lot # 56) under a continuous chain of title since 1902; that they have fenced, enclosed, farmed and grazed said premises since that date, thereby vesting in plaintiff a title in fee to said lands, which is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burns v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Monroe v. RawlingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Lewis v. PoelMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Whitehall Leather Co. v. CapekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Mumrow v. RiddleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Plymouth Canton Community Crier, Inc v. ProseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Detroit v. General Foods Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- McQueen v. BlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.