Legal Opinion
Rimel v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 31, 2017No. Case No: 6:15-cv-2191-Orl-41CEMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier LLC’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Strike Class Action Allegations (“Motion to Compel,” Doc. 23). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spauld-ing submitted a Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” Doc. 61), in which she recommends that the Motion be granted. Plaintiff filed an Objection (Doc. 62), to which Defendants filed a Response (Doc. 66). After an independent de novo review of the record, the R&R will be adopted and confirmed.
I. Factual Background
Defendant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Anderson v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Division 5, LLC v. Fora Financial Advance LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Lockwood v. OliverDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- SINGH v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.