Legal Opinion
Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 29, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16–12538–NMG; Civil Action No. 17–10142–NMG; Civil Action No. 17–10180–NMG; Civil Action No. 17–10316–NMG; Civil Action No. 16–12651–NMG; Civil Action No. 17–10586–NMG; Civil Action No. 17–10598–NMGPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorton, J.
This case involves seven consolidated actions by various taxi medallion holders in the Greater Boston area ("plaintiffs") who allege that Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber" or "defendant") and two of its founders, Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp (the "individual defendants") competed unlawfully in the on-demand, ride-hail ground transportation market in and around Boston, Massachusetts. Plaintiffs in all seven actions allege that Uber competed unfairly in violation of the common law and the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act. Certain plaintiffs also allege that Uber violated state and…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Act For Health v. United Energy WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Advance Dx, Inc. v. YourBio Health, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Centurion Networking Service Partners, LLC v. Barker Bariatric Center, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- MacCausland v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.