State v. Carter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
In this appeal from a conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm, we consider what level of suspicion must precede police use of a drug-detection dog to sniff outside a bank of storage units within a fenced self-storage facility. The district court denied the motion of appellant Andre Lashon Carter to suppress the evidence of a firearm discovered when police, acting pursuant to a search warrant that was based in large part on the results of a dog sniff, searched his rented storage unit. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that the dog sniff was not a “search”…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- People v. CaballesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State of Minnesota v. Heather Leann HorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.