Legal Opinion
Rickert v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 23, 2011No. A08-2269PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
In August 2006 respondent Jeremy Grant Rickert pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal sexual conduct for multiple acts that occurred on or about 2003 through 2006. The district court accepted Rickert’s guilty plea and imposed the presumptive 144-month sentence and the 10-year conditional release mandated by Minn.Stat. § 609.3455, subd. 6 (2010). Rickert did not file a direct appeal. Subsequently, Rickert filed a petition for post-conviction relief arguing that the 10-year conditional release term violated the rule announced in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Berkovitz v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.