Legal Opinion
State v. Bourke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 2006No. A04-1121PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Richard Lowell Bourke was found guilty of conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine and sentenced to 72 months in prison. Bourke argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized during the nighttime search of his property. Bourke contends that the search warrant application did not contain specific facts to justify a nighttime search as required by the constitution and Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2004). The court of appeals affirmed the district court. State v. Bourke, No. A04-1121, 2005 WL 1514324, at *2 (Minn.App. June 28, 2005). We…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.