Hartman v. Hartman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant-husband contends the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-wife. Specifically, defendant-husband contends summary judgment was not proper because a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the separation agreement disposed of the parties’ real property. We disagree.
This Court has stated:
G.S. 52-10 allows husband and wife to enter a separation agreement which “release[s] and quitclaimfs]” any property rights acquired by marriage, and that a release will bar any later claim on the released property. Such a valid separation agreement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Cleland v. Children's Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Brandt v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Estate of Waters v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994