Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Hartman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1986No. 8521DC1173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant-husband contends the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-wife. Specifically, defendant-husband contends summary judgment was not proper because a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the separation agreement disposed of the parties’ real property. We disagree.

This Court has stated:

G.S. 52-10 allows husband and wife to enter a separation agreement which “release[s] and quitclaimfs]” any property rights acquired by marriage, and that a release will bar any later claim on the released property. Such a valid separation agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Cleland v. Children's Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
  2. Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Brandt v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Estate of Waters v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API