Brandt v. Brandt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge GREENE
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
While I agree with the rest of the majority’s decision, I dissent from its holding the trial court did not err in granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. I would vacate the entry of summary judgment and remand for trial on the issue raised in the complaint.
The court’s summary judgment order characterizes the payments due under the Agreement as “alimony.” Alimony is defined in Section 50-16.1(1) as “payment for the support and maintenance of a spouse.” N.C.G.S. Sec. 50-16.1(1) (1987) (emphasis added). However, while the relevant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986