Legal Opinion

Rice v. Rice

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1986No. 8525DC1262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the trial court’s order does not contain sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law to warrant a sixty percent (60%) increase of child support payment over the amount agreed upon in the parties’ separation agreement. We agree.

Our discussion of defendant’s argument begins with a rejection of defendant’s contention that plaintiff must show a substantial change of conditions from the time the separation agreement was entered into. See generally Perry v. Perry, 33 N.C. App. 139, 234 S.E. 2d 449, disc. rev. denied, 292 N.C. 730, 235 S.E. 2d 784…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Perry v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Blount v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API