Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The primary issue between plaintiff and defendant is clearly drawn. The plaintiff contends that its bond is for a single penalty of $10,000 which is the limit of the recovery which may be had against it for any and all defalcations occurring during the life of the bond, to wit, from 15 July, 1929, to 3 February, 1942. The defendant contends that the original bond' assured against defalcation during the succeeding year and each renewal constitutes a new-bond, so that he is entitled to recover losses arising out of the defalcation of the cashier during each bond year, not to exceed $10,000 for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Hawkeye Commercial Men's Ass'n v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Weaver v. Saint Joseph of the Pines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.