Legal Opinion

Jones v. Village of Chagrin Falls

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 95-1458PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue presented in this case is whether failure to exhaust administrative remedies is a jurisdictional defect, or an affirmative defense that may be waived. The issue is of central importance under the facts of this case because Chagrin Falls did not raise the defense on summary judgment and therefore must be held to have waived it if the defect is not jurisdictional. For the reasons that follow, we reaffirm our established precedent that failure to exhaust administrative remedies is a waivable affirmative defense, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Ohio’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Banc One Corp. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Dworning v. City of EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Avery v. Rossford, Ohio Transportation Improvement DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API