Dworning v. City of Euclid
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal, we are asked to determine whether a public employee who alleges discriminatory practices must first exhaust the public employer’s administrative remedies before pursuing the civil action allowed by R.C. Chapter 4112. We hold that the employee need not do so.
Case Background
{¶ 2} Appellee Michael Dworning was employed by appellant city of Euclid for almost 30 years as a firefighter and was serving as fire chief at the time of his separation from employment. Under Section 7, Article V, Charter of the City of Euclid, the fire chief is a member of the classified…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Elek v. Huntington National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Campolieti v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Amesse v. Wright State Physicians, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- AMM Peric Property Invest., Inc. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Binder v. Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.