Schomaeker v. First National Bank of Ottawa
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.
In order to determine whether the Court of Appeals ruled correctly when it held the order of the planning commission invalid, we consider, seriatim, the power of villages to enact zoning ordinances, the authority granted by the Ottawa Zoning Ordinance, and the effect of the action by the planning commission.
We conclude that the order of the commission effectively granted a use variance, as authorized in the Ottawa Zoning Ordinance, and was not rezoning. We further hold that plaintiff was not entitled to declaratory judgment relief in the common pleas court, because such an action does not lie…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Willoughby Hills v. C. C. Bar's Sahara, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Village of Chagrin FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Midwest Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. Deerfield Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.