Legal Opinion
Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 2012No. 2011-0019PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to address several constitutional challenges to the Smoke Free Workplace Act, R.C. Chapter 3794.
I. Factual Background
{¶ 2} On November 7, 2006, Ohio voters passed a ballot initiative to enact the Smoke Free Workplace Act (“the Smoke Free Act”). Codified in R.C. Chapter 3794, the act became effective on December 7, 2006. The Ohio Department of Health (“ODH”) and its designees are charged with the enforcement of the Smoke Free Act. R.C. 3794.07. Subject to certain exemptions, proprietors of public places of employment are not to permit smoking in their…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. HackerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. StensonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. SealeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.