State ex rel. Banc One Corp. v. Walker

Appellants assert that the court of appeals erred in denying the writs. Based on the following, we find that appellants’ claims are meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*171Prohibition; Primary Jurisdiction; Exclusive Jurisdiction

Appellants first claim that they are entitled to a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Walker from proceeding in the underlying action. Although it is evident that Judge Walker and the common pleas court have basic statutory jurisdiction over the claims in Sibbring and DASCO’s civil action pursuant to R.C. 2305.01 and 1331.08, appellants…