Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Lambert

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1995No. 18701, 18801PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBBERPUHL, Circuit Judge.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The following facts were admitted by defendant for the purposes of this motion. From 1958 to 1975, Robert Koenig (Koenig) was sexually abused by Father William Lam*904bert (Lambert), a Catholic priest who was located in Fairfax, South Dakota at the time. Under the pretenses of observing Koenig in the act of his confessed sin of masturbation, Lambert first abused Koenig by fondling him. Koenig was twelve or thirteen years old at the time of this first incident. Over the next seventeen years, Lambert repeatedly abused Koenig, including forcibly raping…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hinkle v. HargensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Maffei v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Tischler v. United Parcel ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API