Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Hargens

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1957No. File 9587PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

This is a malpractice action for damages. The complaint alleges the defendant surgeon left a portion of a surgical needle embedded in plaintiff’s back following an operation performed on September 15, 1932; that defendant negligently failed to remove the needle fragment and fraudulently concealed such fact; and although the plaintiff consulted numerous doctors over the years the needle was not discovered and removed until May 10, 1953. In answer the defendant pleaded the statute of limitations and res judicata. The defense of res judicata has reference to a prior similar action between the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. District Township of Boomer v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Faust v. HosfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Thompson v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API