Legal Opinion
Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] Greg Roth (Roth) brought claims of age discrimination and invasion of privacy against his former employer, Farner-Boeken Company (Farner). A jury returned a verdict finding in favor of Farner on Roth’s age discrimination claim and a verdict in favor of Roth on the invasion of privacy claim. It awarded Roth $25,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages. Farner appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Roth worked as a salesman for Vending Services, a separate Farner related corporation, in Sioux Falls,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Gowan v. Mid Century InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Lord v. Hy-Vee Food StoresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Murphy v. Kmart Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.