Strassburg v. Citizens State Bank
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we examine whether an attorney’s purported misrepresentation of fact to an adversary may toll the statute of limitations. When plaintiff accused Citizens State Bank of converting his money, the Bank’s attorney admitted it had “setoff” funds, but only a fraction of the amount plaintiff claimed. Relying on this statement, plaintiff brought no action against the Bank for ten years, until after he received word it may have’ taken considerably more money. The circuit court granted summary judgment for the Bank, concluding plaintiffs claim was barred by the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- William A. Graham Co. v. HaugheyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.