Legal Opinion

Pickering v. Pickering

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1989No. 16145, 16150PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Paul S. Pickering (Paul), brought an action against his estranged wife, Jody M. Pickering (Jody), and her paramour, Thomas Kimball (Tom). Paul’s complaint alleged alienation of affections and tortious interference with a marital contract against Tom, fraud and deceit and negligent misrepresentation against Jody, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against both Jody and Tom. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Jody and Tom on all causes of action except the cause of action alleging alienation of affections against Tom. From the order of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Robinson v. OmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Feltmeier v. FeltmeierIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API