Legal Opinion

Arctic Motor Freight, Inc. v. Stover

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1977No. 3599PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Respondent Harold Stover instituted an action in the superior court to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of petitioner Arctic Motor Freight, Inc. Subsequently, Arctic Motor submitted a motion for an order waiving Stover’s physician-patient privilege. Petitioner Arctic Motor now seeks review of the waiver orders which were entered by the superior court. The gist of petitioner’s contentions is that the questioned orders are too restricted in the extent to which they waive the physician-patient privilege of Harold Stover.

We have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Continental Insurance Companies v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mathis v. HilderbrandAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Miller v. HarpsterAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jaap v. District Court of Eighth Judicial Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API