Legal Opinion

Domako v. Rowe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1991No. Docket 89257; Calendar 3PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*350Cavanagh, C.J.

We granted leave in this medical malpractice case to determine whether the physician-patient privilege was violated when defense counsel conducted an ex parte interview with the injured plaintiff’s treating physician. We have concluded that no violation occurred, and we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

i

Joseph Rowe, M.D., performed a total abdominal hysterectomy and a right salpingo-oophorectomy (removal of fallopian tube and ovary) on Carol Domako. There was a large fibroid tumor on the lower anterior of Domako’s uterus. Domako was discharged from the hospital on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  4. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nastal v. Henderson & Associates Investigations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Brandt v. Medical Defense AssociatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Reed Dairy Farm v. Consumers Powers Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Caldwell v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API