State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. Appelquist
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FLANIGAN, Judge.
The issue in this prohibition proceeding is: Are the attorneys for Robert E. Stuffle-bam, M.D., a defendant in the underlying medical malpractice action, entitled to obtain, by court order, an authorization from Gene Tefertiller, plaintiff in the malpractice action, permitting them to interview privately Dr. C. Norman Shealy, who is a physician who treated Tefertiller for the injuries which Tefertiller alleges were caused by Dr. Stufflebam, if Dr. Shealy consents to the interview?
For the reasons which follow, this court answers the question in the affirmative, *884makes permanent…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
- Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Florence B. Corcoran Wife Of/and Wayne D. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.