Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. Appelquist

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1985No. 13940PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Judge.

The issue in this prohibition proceeding is: Are the attorneys for Robert E. Stuffle-bam, M.D., a defendant in the underlying medical malpractice action, entitled to obtain, by court order, an authorization from Gene Tefertiller, plaintiff in the malpractice action, permitting them to interview privately Dr. C. Norman Shealy, who is a physician who treated Tefertiller for the injuries which Tefertiller alleges were caused by Dr. Stufflebam, if Dr. Shealy consents to the interview?

For the reasons which follow, this court answers the question in the affirmative, *884makes permanent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  5. Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Florence B. Corcoran Wife Of/and Wayne D. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API