Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Hilderbrand
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1966No. 694PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
416 P.2d 8 (1966)
Sherwood W. MATHIS and Acme Electric Co., Petitioners,
v.
Kathleen HILDERBRAND, a minor, by her Father and Next Friend, Barnie Hilderbrand, and Barnie Hilderbrand, Individually, Respondents.
No. 694.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
June 20, 1966.
Concurring Opinion July 15, 1966.
Edward A. Merdes, McNealy & Merdes, Fairbanks, for petitioners.
No appearance for respondents.
Before NESBETT, C.J., and DIMOND and RABINOWITZ, JJ.
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
The issue presented for review is whether a plaintiff in a personal injury action waives the physician-patient privilege by the commencement of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Randa v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Arizona & New Mexico Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- Awtry v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- San Francisco Unified School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Garner v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.