Legal Opinion

Miller v. Harpster

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1964No. 483PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a personal injury action in which respondent has complained that while a guest in petitioner’s automobile he was injured to his damage in the amount of $150,000.

We have granted review of an order of the trial court which, among other things, required petitioner to produce for inspection under Civil Rule 34:(1) Defendant’s public liability and property damage insurance policy covering the operation of his vehicle at the time of the collision.(2) Copies of all written statements of witnesses to said collision occurring on or about September 14, 1962, including any and all written…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. People Ex Rel. Terry v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Maddox v. GraumanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance Company v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API