Legal Opinion
Martin v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 15, 2011No. Civil Action 10-2203PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SLOMSKY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Strike Class Allegations from the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 16) and Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 17). Defendant contends that class action allegations should be struck from the Amended Complaint because the proposed Class cannot satisfy the prerequisites of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and that the Amended Complaint should be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Doll v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Goode v. Lexisnexis Risk & Information Analytics Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.