Chidsey v. Ellis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Murray County; R. McMillan, J%idge. Action between J. C. Chidsey and others and D. F. Ellis and others. From an order dissolving a temporary injunction, the former appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This case presents error from the district court of Murray county. A statement sufficient to present the controlling proposition is that the trial court granted a temporary injunction, which, on motion, it dissolved. From this action appeal was taken to this court and a supersedeas granted staying the effect of the. order dissolving the injunction. It is conceded by both parties that the force and effect of the motion upon which the temporary injunction was dissolved was that of a demurrer, and counsel ii^ their petition in error state that the same “was tantamount to the declaration that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Morrill v. CasperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Board of County Commissioners v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Carle v. Oklahoma Woolen MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Campbell v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cabell v. McLishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Freeling v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Frenn v. NaboursSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.