Legal Opinion

Cabell v. McLish

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1916No. 7005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; A. Eddleman, Judge. Action by Reuben McLish and others against J. V. Cabell and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant Cabell brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CLAY, C.

This action was brought by Reuben McLish, a minor, by his guardian, J. E. McCarty, in the district court of Carter county, Okla., against J. V. Cabell, a former guardian, and J. S. Mullen, J. P. Mullen, E. -Dunlap, L. V. Mullen, and the Southern Surety Company, as sureties on certain bonds executed by said J. Y. Cabell, as guardian, alleging that Cabell, as guardian of Reuben McLish, became possessed of certain funds belonging to said minor; that on July 22. 1912, an order of the county court of Carter county was entered, requiring the said J. Y. Cabell to pay to his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SlinkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. In Re Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Bank of Buchanan County v. PriestlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Francis v. SperrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API