Legal Opinion

Carle v. Oklahoma Woolen Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County; before . B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Gillette, J.:

It appears from the record in this case that on the 3rd day of April, 1903, the plaintiffs conveyed to defendants twenty acres of land, the same being a part of a tract of 156 acres owned by the plaintiffs, lying immediately west of the city of Oklahoma City, for the nomina] consideration of one dollar, for the purposes of erecting thereon a woolen mill, and thereby enhancing the value of other-property owned by the plaintiffs adjacent thereto. The defendant at the time executed and delivered to the plaintiff a bond, which is made the basis of this action,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  5. Robertson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. McCarthy v. Employers' Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Cabell v. McLishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Chidsey v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API