Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'Neil
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge. Action by Mary O’Neil against the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SPIARP, C.
The original petition in error contains 69 assignments of error, the amended petition in error four additional assignments. Authorities are cited in support of but eleven of the points urged as grounds for reversal, and some of these involve a consideration of the same question, being presented in a somewhat changed form; the brief of counsel as to the remaining questions consisting of little more than a restatement of the several assignments of error, followed by the general statement that by reason thereof the court committed error. This court has recently passed upon…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ZickafooseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Chattanooga Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. of Dallas v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Sharp v. Pawhuska Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.