Legal Opinion

Crawford v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 9, 2002No. 01-487 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*192 OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

Plaintiff David E. Crawford is a warrant officer in the United States Navy with more than 20 years of active service. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s Mot.) at 1; Complaint (Compl.) at Enclosure 1 (Plaintiffs Request for Voluntary Retirement dated June 14, 2001). Plaintiff was convicted by general court-martial of several counts of sexual misconduct with a child under the age of 16 years and was sentenced by a military judge on September…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Breneman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Albino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Hanford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Ullman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API