Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 8, 2003No. 03-839 CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest action comes before the court on Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (TRO Mot. or TRO Motion). Plaintiff, Bannum, Inc. (Bannum), protests the failure of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to award a contract to operate a Community Correction Center (CCC) in Beaumont, Texas, in a timely manner. Complaint (Compl.) 111. For the following reasons, the court DENIES plaintiffs motion.
The complaint was filed on April 28, 2003. During a telephonic status conference held on April 28, 2003, the court set a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Sheridan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Akal Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Eskridge Research Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.