Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 1, 1985No. 84-497PublishedCited by 1,200 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
This case requires the Court to revisit the data-consideration provision of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 61 Stat. 163, as amended, 7 U. S. C. §136 et seq., which was considered last Term in Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U. S. 986 (1984). Monsanto examined whether FIFRA’s data-consideration provision effects an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment. In this case we address whether Article III of the Constitution prohibits Congress from selecting binding arbitration with only limited judicial review as the mechanism for resolving…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,200 opinions
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Casey Dooley v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
1,195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.