Legal Opinion

Ullman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 25, 2005No. 04-1275-TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court are plaintiffs Two-Count Complaint (Compl.), plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Pl.’s Mot. or plaintiffs motion), defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s Mot. or defendant’s motion), and the responsive briefing on the parties’ respective motions.1 Plaintiff moves for a summary judgment that “the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Department of Justice failed to provide, despite repeated requests, the Advice of Chief Counsel,” in contravention of 26 U.S.C. § 6110(j) (2000), and that defendant “intentionally and willfully failed to act in…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Black v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Perry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Feist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Filler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API