Laymance v. Utter
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling the first account of an executor. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by M. J. Laymance, who is described in his notice of appeal as “a party in interest in said estate, and assignee of Mary L. Flick, one of the legatees and devisees under the last will and testament of said N. D. Thayer, deceased,” from an order settling the final account of the executor.
The transcript contains no bill of exceptions or statement authenticated in any way by the judge of the trial court, but contains certain documents certified to by the clerk, as follows :—
1. A decree of partial distribution to M. J. Laymance, dated and filed February 27, 1903.
2. A notice of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In re Estate of PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Nash v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- In Re Howard's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Estate of Lynch, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1884
- Garret v. LannanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Howard v. CritchlowUtah Supreme Court · 1945