Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Page

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,695PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from an order in the Probate Court of Alameda County. Redman, J. Upon the hearing of the settlement of the account, Charlotte G. Page, a minor interested in said estate, appeared by her guardian, E. S. Wetmore, and objected to the account, and appealed from the order settling the same.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

Appeal from a judgment of the late Probate Court of Alameda County, settling the second annual account of the estate of Charlotte M. Page, deceased.

The transcript on appeal contains what purports to be a bill of exceptions, in ■ which it is stated, in substance, that the guardian of a minor child of the decedent had, by his attorney, filed written objections to the account of the administratrix, and that after a hearing had, the Court allowed the account, to which the guardian excepted, and “ now proposes this, his bill of exceptions.’’ What purports to have been the testimony of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teal v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Gurnee v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Dwinelle v. HenriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dougherty v. DoughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API