Legal Opinion

Dail v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There was evidence tending to show that at the time of the injury, and some time prior thereto, defendant was engaged in the business (286) of manufacturing, bottling and sale of a beverage called Coca-Cola, and other soft drinks; that plaintiff and a Mr. Mann were engaged in business and dealt in soft drinks, and from time to time bought quantities of these soft drinks of defendant, and resold same by retail to their customers.

E. M. Dail, plaintiff, speaking more directly to the occurrence, testified as follows: "I am plaintiff. Was injured on 27 June, 1907, in my store at Oriental. I and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ross v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Fitzgerald v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API