Legal Opinion
Boone v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 29, 2009No. Civil Action 05-346 (RWR)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Anita Boone, has sued the Secretary of State 1 under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) alleging that the State Department discriminated against her because of her age, race, and sex by refusing to promote her on two occasions. The Department moves for summary judgment, contending that Boone failed to exhaust her administrative remedies and that she has not rebutted the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons offered by the Department for its actions.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Noisette v. GEITHNERDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bright v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Koch v. WalterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Morris v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Thomas v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.