Thomas v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel
Re Document Nos.: 17, 19, 24.
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Earnest Thomas, is an employee with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) who claims-that he was passed over for several promotions based on his race (black), national origin (African), age (56 at time of the complaint) and that he was retaliated against for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Akbulut v. McAleenanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Maggio v. Wisconsin Avenue Psychiatric Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Maggio v. Wisconsin Avenue Psychiatric Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015